Doesn’t it seem a bit odd how the “God” of the Old Testament completely micro-managed the lives of the Hebrews with at least 613 laws, while the “God” of the New Testament suddenly decides from one moment to the next that people are mature enough to manage their own lives, thus condensing all the laws into one “the Golden Rule”. The funny thing is that nothing changed as far as the human condition and inclination to do the so-called “bad things” that the laws under the Old Covenant were supposed to keep them from doing.

 

Why did a person get stoned to death for picking up sticks on the Sabbath under the Old Covenant and suddenly after Jesus comes “God” says it’s okay to pick up sticks as long as no harm is done to another?  Following the same logic, Mary the mother of Jesus could have been stoned to death under “God’s” law for picking up sticks on the Sabbath while she was pregnant with Jesus, but after the crucifixion the Sabbath law no longer warranted the death penalty. Even the case of the woman caught in adultery which Jesus stopped; under the Old Covenant law given by “God” she should have been stoned. The same goes for every other person alive during that transitional time period, because the Jews were commanded to carry out the laws given them from “God” through Moses, if they didn’t carry out “Gods” laws they would have been punished, or killed accordingly. Over, and over again in the Old Testament we read of people being killed or punished for transgressions of the law, yet with the advent of the New Covenant everything changed in the twinkling of an eye.

 

I understand when a human ruler changes his mind because of new knowledge or a change of heart, but according to the Bible “God” is supposed to be all knowing and unchanging, so what’s up with that? Seems to me like another case of human invention, where earlier authors of Scripture said things that conflicted with how the later authors perceived “God” to be, so corrections were made to try and “fix” the problem without throwing out the earlier writings. In that manner a transition could be made correcting for errors in the perception of God, all the while keeping the original documents that were deemed to be “God given”…but, then we are stuck with a made-up, human invented “God”.

4 Responses to “The Changing God”

  • Greg:

    I read in the old testament that the creator of earth creates both good/benefit and evil/burden. See e.g., Isaiah 45:7.

    It seems to me that it is usually organized religions that claim their dogma is correct, and ask their followers to ignore the history of false prophets and scribes and witnesses, mistranslations, book burnings, logical conundrums, and moral failures. Was moses perfect? Is “scripture” perfect? These seem to just be part of a saga – where truth explains both truth and falsity in advance.

    Indeed, it seems to me that the creator of earth promised us a saga of truth and deception, and that’s what we’re receiving. Apply false and immature expectations of man (especially toward ancient texts pieced together) and the result often manifests like a whole lot of religulousness. http://www.logicalhierarchy.com/Logical_Hierarchy/Home/Entries/2010/6/1_Religionism_%28We_The_Pharisees%29.html

    Is death on earth not just a form of reality? What about service? All actions have consequence. I like the idea of a new covenant to complete this age of the saga, and start things new. It makes me happy to hear the good news of a way toward a form of salvation, namely, through Yeshua. It’s the promise of a new beginning, and I expect the salvation obtained will be part of its own new saga as well… have we learned anything yet from the old one?

    http://www.logicalhierarchy.com/Logical_Hierarchy/Home/Entries/2010/5/27_The_Mysterious_Contract_Offer_in_John_8%3A31_.html

  • Rose:

    Hello Greg, I’m not sure I get the point of your post, but I would like to comment on your statement “Indeed, it seems to me that the creator of earth promised us a saga of truth and deception, and that’s what we’re receiving”. What makes you think that the Bible contains the inspired words of the creator of the universe? Muslims believe the Koran to be the inspired words of Allah…who is right?

  • Greg:

    People tend to misinterpret words.

    You won’t find me claiming the bible contains the inspired words of the creator of the universe. I mean, really, how could I know? The links should help clarify that.

    My comment is meant to emphasize that the creator of man appears to have foreknowledge of the books that made it into the canon, and those books are apparently filled with both relative truths and errors, so we are presented with a saga of choices and tests. It feels like we’re learning something in the process…

  • Rose:

    Hi Greg, thanks for clarifying your point. It does indeed appear that there is a supernatural design to the 66 book biblical canon, but by no means do I attribute the Bible’s design to the god portrayed within its pages. The Bible gives us great insight and wisdom into the thinking of Bronze age man and I feel that I am learning a great deal by studying its many truths along with understanding its errors. My journey continues…

Leave a Reply

Ads by Google
August 2011
M T W T F S S
« Jul   Sep »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  
Ads by Google

Designed by Gadgets, In collaboration with  Health Advisor, web hosting, and Webhosting Philippines .